False History

Editorial

George Orwell said: "He who controls the past, controls the present; and he who controls the present, controls the future."

When you stop to think about it, this is very true. It also explains why there is such a great concern on the part of certain groups to constantly "remake history."

`Yesterday' cannot be changed, objectively speaking. What is past, is past. At least, the facts of the past, that is, the things that truly were said and done, cannot be erased.

However, with the help of that fantastic faculty called `imagination,' we can do almost anything. How so?

Well, it is very easy. You see, what stands between objective reality _ that which is true and real independently of our own thinking and willing _ is our imagination. Our ability to make images according to our desires is what brings us into conflict with what is and what we wish it to be. Example: If I have a ten dollar bill in my hand, that is the reality. But, I can imagine the ten dollar bill is a hundred dollar bill. I can substitute in my imagination the reality that the piece of paper in my hand is not a ten dollar bill, but a hundred dollar bill.

Rightly or wrongly; for good or for evil _ we make images of things the way they either are, or the way we want them to be, or would wish them to be .

This is the battle ground upon which truth and error confront each other. This is where subjectivity and objectivity clash. If everyone loved the truth as it really is (and there is no other kind!), we would all be able to agree on things. If everyone made an effort to strip themselves of their subjective, slanted imagination in order to perceive reality as it is, there would be no cause for disagreement: Truth is one and everyone desiring the truth would be able to perceive and rejoice in it.

Historical truth is nothing more than the honest recording of actual events. We trust historians because we believe that they are presenting what actually happened in the past.

The duty of the historian is to research documents and give them an objective interpretation. But, historians are people, too. Depending upon their personal integrity and completeness of their research, that which we call `history' will be an accurate, objective presentation of past events.

The duty of the historian is not an easy one. It requires extraordinary self-discipline and dedication to truth. However, it was once observed: "Science has no religion; but the scientist does."

Likewise, the currently maligned Holy Father, Pope Pius XII, stated in his Encyclical Letter Humani generis:

"Disagreement and error among men on moral and religious matters have always been a cause of profound sorrow to all good men, but above all to the true and loyal sons of the Church, especially today, when we see the principles of Christian culture being attacked on all sides.

It is not surprising that such discord and error should always have existed outside the fold of Christ. For though, absolutely speaking, human reason by its own natural force and light can arrive at a true and certain knowledge of the one personal God, Who by His providence watches over and governs the world, and also of the natural law, which the Creator has written in our hearts, still there are not a few obstacles to prevent reason from making efficient and fruitful use of its mental ability. The truths that have to do with God and the relations between God and men, completely surpass the sensible order and demand surrender and self-abnegation in order to be put into practice and to influence practical life.

Now the human intellect, in gaining the knowledge of such truths is hampered both by the activity of the senses and the imagination, and by evil passions arising from original sin. Hence, men easily persuade themselves in such matters that what they do not wish to believe is false or at least doubtful."

For the Communist, `truth' is whatever serves his purpose; and `error' is everything that stands in the way of his perverse ambition. The German nation was fighting `Communism' _ the same `-ism' that the Americans claimed to oppose so strongly.

Pope Pius XII was the last legitimate Pope of the Roman Catholic Church. With his death, the organized forces of the Antichrist found an easy entrance into the highest places of the Church from whence flow all the subversive doctrines that keep Catholics `Catholic' while leading them into the camp of the Antichrist. Ecumenism, or, more correctly, religious indifference, promoted from the usurped Chair of Peter has made it possible to usher in the Great Apostasy foretold by St. Paul.

The followers of the Father of Lies have no problem with their tactic of smearing anyone who opposes their Luciferian goals. Those of their members who pretend to some kind of `religion' have invented a clever and convenient form of self-absolution for the sins they know they will freely and deliberately commit: They say a `prayer' (the "Kol Nidre". It is not so much a `prayer' as a declaration.

As the eminent psycho-analyst Professor Theodor Reik, the celebrated pupil of the famous Dr. Sigmund Freud wrote:

"The text was to the effect that all oaths which believers take between one Day of Atonement and the next Day of Atonement are declared void."

The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia confirms the fact that the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer has no spiritual value as might be believed because it is recited in synagogues on the Day of Atonement as the prologue of the religious ceremonies which follow it. The secular significance of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer is emphatically indicated by the analysis in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia:

"The Kol Nidre has nothing whatever to do with the actual idea of the Day of Atonement….it attained to extraordinary solemnity and popularity by reason of the fact that it was the first prayer recited on this holiest of days." (Vol, VI, page 441).

This ethnic non-semitic group of racists have a basic procedure. They call it "chutzpah." Chutzpah is a tactic whereby the guilty project their guilt upon the innocent, thus appearing as the innocent victims in the eyes of the masses who are ignorant of this tactic.

Pope Pius XII is hated by the anti-Christian Luciferian forces in the world because he would not allow himself to be used for an evil purpose, unlike John XXIII, Paul VI and John Paul II. In the case of John Paul II (Karl Wojtyla), it is already widely known that he is ethnically a Khazar (That is, a "Jew") on his mother's side and Polish only on his father's side.

Return to Contents

Return to Homepage.